Triple
T8176310
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | "Another one" |
E190943
|
entity |
| Predicate | semanticTheme |
P261
|
FINISHED |
| Object | continuation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: continuation | Statement: ["Another one", semanticTheme, continuation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: semanticTheme Context triple: ["Another one", semanticTheme, continuation]
-
A.
themeFor
Indicates that something serves as the central subject, topic, or focus for another thing (such as an event, work, or activity).
-
B.
theme
chosen
Indicates the entity that is the primary participant or content affected or characterized by an action, event, or state.
-
C.
themeContrast
Indicates a relationship where two themes are compared or opposed to highlight their differences or tension.
-
D.
themeRepresentation
Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, depiction, or expression of the thematic content associated with another entity.
-
E.
themeInspiration
Indicates that one entity serves as the creative source or conceptual basis that inspires or shapes the theme expressed in another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82c1c0a08190bf8692b4d91a03ca |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb4ab8295081909a450fcaa34f6ec6 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 4:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36a7952481908f34e3e82f375a84 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:40 p.m.