Triple
T8164606
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Artikel 42 Grondwet |
E190658
|
entity |
| Predicate | rechtskracht |
P81047
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hoogste nationale rechtsnorm onder de Grondwet |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hoogste nationale rechtsnorm onder de Grondwet | Statement: [Artikel 42 Grondwet, rechtskracht, hoogste nationale rechtsnorm onder de Grondwet]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rechtskracht Context triple: [Artikel 42 Grondwet, rechtskracht, hoogste nationale rechtsnorm onder de Grondwet]
-
A.
rights
Indicates that an entity possesses entitlements, permissions, or legal/moral claims in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
enforcedLaw
Indicates that an authority actively applies or upholds a specific law to regulate behavior or resolve situations.
-
C.
legalAct
Indicates that an entity performs, enacts, or is involved in a formal legal action, measure, or proceeding under a legal framework.
-
D.
legalAuthorityIn
Indicates that an entity holds official legal power, jurisdiction, or governing authority within a specified area or domain.
-
E.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82c0ef14819083713f4473dd847c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb4664fef881908b0dc7b158aca398 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36a4c40c81909f60aef0e1624c13 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb40a017608190b6b48cf60335fa8d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:38 p.m.