Triple
T8143763
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ion (rhapsode) |
E190157
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedByAuthorToIllustrate |
P42995
|
FINISHED |
| Object | theory of divine madness in poetry |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: theory of divine madness in poetry | Statement: [Ion (rhapsode), usedByAuthorToIllustrate, theory of divine madness in poetry]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedByAuthorToIllustrate Context triple: [Ion (rhapsode), usedByAuthorToIllustrate, theory of divine madness in poetry]
-
A.
isUsedToIllustrate
Indicates that one entity serves as an example or demonstration to clarify, explain, or represent another entity.
-
B.
usedByAuthorTo
chosen
Indicates that something is employed or utilized by an author to achieve a particular purpose or effect.
-
C.
usedByAuthor
Indicates that something (such as a method, tool, or resource) is employed or utilized by an author.
-
D.
hasIllustrationsBy
Indicates that one entity (such as a work or publication) includes illustrations that were created by another entity (the illustrator).
-
E.
notableWorkUsed
Indicates that a particular notable work is utilized, referenced, or incorporated in relation to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82bd9900819099477cdc2eb4244f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb4444bb248190beaaa2ce4b8f3eaa |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb369c0d0481908762c488d7f77e74 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:36 p.m.