Triple

T8140047
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Simmons family E190071 entity
Predicate typeOfNotability P74159 FINISHED
Object regional historical notability LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: regional historical notability | Statement: [Simmons family, typeOfNotability, regional historical notability]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfNotability
Context triple: [Simmons family, typeOfNotability, regional historical notability]
  • A. relativeNotability
    Indicates how notable or prominent one entity is in comparison to another entity or set of entities.
  • B. notableFor
    Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
  • C. lacksNotabilityAs
    Indicates that one entity is considered insufficiently notable or significant to be associated with or classified as the other entity.
  • D. notableCategoryType chosen
    Indicates that an entity is notably associated with or classified under a particular category type.
  • E. notableExposure
    Indicates that an entity has received significant public attention, visibility, or coverage, making it notably exposed or recognized.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82bd9900819099477cdc2eb4244f completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb4404e5308190a323485701f09d86 completed March 31, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb369c0d0481908762c488d7f77e74 completed March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:35 p.m.