Triple
T8135383
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Milo Tindle |
E189956
|
entity |
| Predicate | cunning |
P1716
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Milo Tindle, cunning, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cunning Context triple: [Milo Tindle, cunning, true]
-
A.
tricked
Indicates that one entity intentionally deceived another into believing something false or acting under a false impression.
-
B.
gimmick
Indicates that an entity uses or features a novel, attention-grabbing trick or device primarily intended to attract interest rather than provide substantive value.
-
C.
tactic
chosen
Indicates a strategic method or maneuver employed by one entity to influence, counter, or gain advantage over another in a specific context.
-
D.
secretive
Indicates that an entity deliberately withholds information or conceals its thoughts, actions, or intentions from others.
-
E.
trap
Indicates that an entity captures, confines, or ensnares another entity, typically preventing its escape or movement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82bcb4848190a9a9d036ad768642 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb4c4c2e388190b86854f8b1765e61 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 4:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb3696379c8190a20965e59ed8f370 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:35 p.m.