Triple

T8117000
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject USM E189499 entity
Predicate securityScope P81364 FINISHED
Object message-level security LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: message-level security | Statement: [USM, securityScope, message-level security]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityScope
Context triple: [USM, securityScope, message-level security]
  • A. securityContext
    Indicates the security-related settings or constraints under which an action, process, or interaction is performed.
  • B. securityAspect
    Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
  • C. securityRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific security-related role, permission level, or access profile within a system or context.
  • D. securityType
    Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
  • E. accessScope
    Indicates the extent or boundaries of access that one entity has to another entity or resource.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82baad008190ab2859712b9b1607 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb4664fef881908b0dc7b158aca398 completed March 31, 2026, 3:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb368e7f4c81909aabd7716f0de79d completed March 31, 2026, 2:50 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb46635424819085d086972b264280 completed March 31, 2026, 3:58 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:33 p.m.