Triple
T8113421
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 4035 |
E189410
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletes |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 3008 |
E707272
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 3008 | Statement: [RFC 4035, obsoletes, RFC 3008]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 3008 Context triple: [RFC 4035, obsoletes, RFC 3008]
-
A.
RFC 3008
chosen
RFC 3008 is an earlier Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standards document related to DNS security that was later superseded by RFC 4033.
-
B.
RFC 5308
RFC 5308 is the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) specification that extends the IS-IS routing protocol to support IPv6 addressing and routing.
-
C.
RFC 3207
RFC 3207 is the Internet standard that specifies the STARTTLS extension for upgrading plain text email connections to use TLS encryption in SMTP.
-
D.
RFC 3090
RFC 3090 is an earlier Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standards document related to the Domain Name System (DNS) that was later superseded by RFC 4035.
-
E.
RFC 3168
RFC 3168 is an IETF standard that specifies the addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP and TCP to enable end-to-end congestion signaling without relying solely on packet loss.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82baad008190ab2859712b9b1607 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb432d7dfc8190b9c980f32c7b4623 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:44 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ccbea5d39c819099d52545410ae564 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 6:43 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:32 p.m.