Triple
T8109269
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prahova County |
E189305
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bușteni |
E727259
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bușteni | Statement: [Prahova County, contains, Bușteni]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bușteni Context triple: [Prahova County, contains, Bușteni]
-
A.
Bușteni
chosen
Bușteni is a Romanian mountain resort town in the Prahova Valley, known for its access to the Bucegi Mountains and popular skiing and hiking opportunities.
-
B.
Băilești
Băilești is a town in southwestern Romania, in Dolj County, known as a local agricultural and commercial center.
-
C.
Giurgiulești
Giurgiulești is a Moldovan village and river port located at the country’s southern tip, serving as its only direct access point to the Danube and maritime trade routes.
-
D.
Buzău
Buzău is a city in southeastern Romania, serving as the capital of Buzău County and an important regional economic and cultural center.
-
E.
Râmnicu Vâlcea
Râmnicu Vâlcea is a city in south-central Romania, located on the Olt River and serving as the capital of Vâlcea County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b9d5848190a24672775d5c5011 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb42fbc57c81908c6be87bbc547085 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:43 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cde709d3188190b3a954a613c3c5b2 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:32 p.m.