Triple

T8105130
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Superclásico (Boca vs River) E189207 entity
Predicate policePresence P80479 FINISHED
Object heavy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: heavy | Statement: [Superclásico (Boca vs River), policePresence, heavy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: policePresence
Context triple: [Superclásico (Boca vs River), policePresence, heavy]
  • A. policePrecinct
    Indicates that a specified location, building, or area functions as or is designated as a police precinct.
  • B. policeControl
    Indicates that one entity exercises authoritative oversight, regulation, or enforcement power over another, as a police force does over people or areas under its jurisdiction.
  • C. hasPoliceStationsIn
    Indicates that one entity possesses, manages, or contains one or more police stations located within the area or jurisdiction of another entity.
  • D. policeSystem
    Indicates a relationship where an entity functions as, belongs to, or is governed by a system of law enforcement or policing.
  • E. hasPoliceDepartment
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is administratively associated with a police department.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b9d5848190a24672775d5c5011 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb42c0ce6481909887be82c8019383 completed March 31, 2026, 3:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb04a2ed1c8190b73562321ad688bc completed March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb14be17208190bb51c3dfcb613f20 completed March 31, 2026, 12:26 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:31 p.m.