Triple
T8095419
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Commander, Naval Air Forces, U.S. Pacific Fleet |
E188970
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeCommand |
P7157
|
FINISHED |
| Object | air type commander |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: air type commander | Statement: [Commander, Naval Air Forces, U.S. Pacific Fleet, typeCommand, air type commander]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeCommand Context triple: [Commander, Naval Air Forces, U.S. Pacific Fleet, typeCommand, air type commander]
-
A.
typeOfCommand
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of command in relation to another entity.
-
B.
commandType
Indicates the specific kind or category of command being issued or executed in the relationship.
-
C.
commands
Indicates that one entity holds authority over another and issues directives or orders that the other is expected to follow.
-
D.
definesCommand
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes a command that another entity can execute or obey.
-
E.
coreCommand
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or central command or control authority over another entity or process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b7b3e88190b9041ab0ef28b3cb |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb4291f1d4819098985ac2b20b6c75 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb04a14cd88190a79ed26cbeec1c33 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:30 p.m.