Triple
T8092269
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Corsicana |
E188894
|
entity |
| Predicate | county |
P75
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Navarro County |
E118620
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Navarro County | Statement: [Corsicana, county, Navarro County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Navarro County Context triple: [Corsicana, county, Navarro County]
-
A.
Navarro County, Texas
chosen
Navarro County, Texas is a county in north-central Texas known for its seat in Corsicana and its location along major transportation routes between Dallas and Houston.
-
B.
Hidalgo County
Hidalgo County is a populous county in South Texas along the U.S.–Mexico border, known for its rapidly growing communities and role in the Rio Grande Valley region.
-
C.
Atascosa County
Atascosa County is a largely rural county in southern Texas known for its agricultural economy and proximity to the San Antonio metropolitan area.
-
D.
Guadalupe County
Guadalupe County is a rural county in eastern New Mexico known for its historic Route 66 towns, ranching landscapes, and Southwestern desert scenery.
-
E.
Guadalupe County
Guadalupe County is a county in south-central Texas that includes rapidly growing suburban and rural communities east of San Antonio.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b7b3e88190b9041ab0ef28b3cb |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb42217a1881909792b08a2f06fb75 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:40 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d189c795d48190ba80739d07bc899c |
completed | April 4, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:30 p.m.