Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants | Statement: [Sweatt v. Painter, segregationPolicy, University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants]

Target entity: University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants
Context triple: [Sweatt v. Painter, segregationPolicy, University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants]

• A. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
  Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
• B. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
  McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down racial segregation within a public university’s graduate program, marking an important step toward the desegregation of higher education.
• C. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
  Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
• D. Sweatt v. Painter
  Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged racial segregation in higher education and helped lay the groundwork for Brown v. Board of Education.
• E. Gratz v. Bollinger
  Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants
Triple: [Sweatt v. Painter, segregationPolicy, University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants]

University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants was the racially discriminatory admissions policy at the University of Texas School of Law that barred African American students from enrollment, leading to the landmark Supreme Court case Sweatt v. Painter.

Target entity: University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants
Target entity description: University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants was the racially discriminatory admissions policy at the University of Texas School of Law that barred African American students from enrollment, leading to the landmark Supreme Court case Sweatt v. Painter.

• A. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
  Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
• B. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
  McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down racial segregation within a public university’s graduate program, marking an important step toward the desegregation of higher education.
• C. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
  Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
• D. Sweatt v. Painter chosen
  Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged racial segregation in higher education and helped lay the groundwork for Brown v. Board of Education.
• E. Gratz v. Bollinger
  Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
• F. None of above.

Target predicate: segregationPolicy
Context triple: [Sweatt v. Painter, segregationPolicy, University of Texas Law School excluded Black applicants]

• A. segregationBasis
  Indicates the criterion or characteristic used as the basis for separating or distinguishing one group or set from another.
• B. typeOfSegregationAddressed chosen
  Indicates the specific form or category of segregation that is being targeted, handled, or dealt with in a given context.
• C. locationPolicy
  Indicates a rule or constraint governing where an entity is allowed, required, or restricted to be located.
• D. admissionPolicy
  Indicates the rules or criteria governing whether and how entities are allowed to be admitted or granted access.
• E. governingPolicy
  Indicates that one entity serves as the authoritative policy or set of rules that directs, constrains, or regulates the behavior, operation, or decisions of another entity.
• F. None of above.