Triple
T8083893
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Weighted Inclusive Gregory method |
E188682
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Single Transferable Vote surplus transfer method |
C20000
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Single Transferable Vote surplus transfer method Context triple: [Weighted Inclusive Gregory method, instanceOf, Single Transferable Vote surplus transfer method]
-
A.
end-to-end auditable voting scheme
An end-to-end auditable voting scheme is a voting system that allows each voter and independent observers to verify, from ballot casting through tallying, that all recorded votes are correctly included in the final result without revealing how any individual voted.
-
B.
voting method
chosen
A voting method is a systematic procedure for collecting individual preferences and determining a collective decision or winner based on those inputs.
-
C.
cryptographic voting system
A cryptographic voting system is a secure, privacy-preserving election mechanism that uses cryptographic protocols to ensure ballot secrecy, voter authentication, integrity of tallies, and verifiable results without revealing individual votes.
-
D.
Electorate
The Electorate is the collective body of individuals in a defined political jurisdiction who are legally eligible and authorized to vote in public elections.
-
E.
result in social choice theory
A result in social choice theory is a formal theorem or proposition that characterizes how individual preferences can be aggregated into a collective decision under specified axioms or conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b662e88190b9323daab8c28a21 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:29 p.m.