Triple
T8083813
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Australian Senate elections |
E188680
|
entity |
| Predicate | electoralSystemReform |
P51946
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2016 Senate voting reforms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2016 Senate voting reforms | Statement: [Australian Senate elections, electoralSystemReform, 2016 Senate voting reforms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electoralSystemReform Context triple: [Australian Senate elections, electoralSystemReform, 2016 Senate voting reforms]
-
A.
changedElectoralSystem
Indicates that an entity has altered or replaced a previously existing electoral system with a different one.
-
B.
electoralReformContext
chosen
Indicates the context or circumstances related to changes or proposed changes in an electoral system or voting rules.
-
C.
electoralSystemConcerned
Indicates that something is related to, affected by, or focused on a particular electoral system.
-
D.
electoralSystemContext
Indicates the electoral system or framework within which a political or electoral event, action, or relationship takes place.
-
E.
electoralFreedom
Indicates the extent to which individuals and groups can participate in elections—such as voting, running for office, and campaigning—without undue restriction, coercion, or manipulation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b662e88190b9323daab8c28a21 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb415e61ac81909e924aea69a7ff77 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb04a14cd88190a79ed26cbeec1c33 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:29 p.m.