Triple

T8083707
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Droop quota E188678 entity
Predicate usedIn P98 FINISHED
Object single transferable vote E35891 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single transferable vote | Statement: [Droop quota, usedIn, single transferable vote]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: single transferable vote
Context triple: [Droop quota, usedIn, single transferable vote]
  • A. Single Transferable Vote chosen
    Single Transferable Vote is a proportional representation electoral system in which voters rank candidates by preference and seats are allocated by transferring votes according to these rankings.
  • B. Borda count
    The Borda count is a ranked voting method in which voters order candidates and points are assigned based on position in each ranking, with the candidate having the highest total score winning.
  • C. Sainte-Laguë method
    The Sainte-Laguë method is a highest-averages system of party-list proportional representation that allocates seats more evenly between large and small parties than the d’Hondt method.
  • D. d’Hondt method
    The d’Hondt method is a highest-averages formula used in proportional representation systems to allocate seats or posts among parties based on their share of the vote.
  • E. Mixed-Member Proportional
    Mixed-Member Proportional is an electoral system that combines single-member district representation with party-list proportional representation to align a legislature’s overall seat distribution closely with parties’ shares of the popular vote.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b662e88190b9323daab8c28a21 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb415e61ac81909e924aea69a7ff77 completed March 31, 2026, 3:37 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cc63ff37a88190a980e023a9b7c30c completed April 1, 2026, 12:17 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:29 p.m.