Triple

T8080146
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject UNTV E188592 entity
Predicate hasReligiousProgramming P80379 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [UNTV, hasReligiousProgramming, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReligiousProgramming
Context triple: [UNTV, hasReligiousProgramming, yes]
  • A. hasReligiousTheme
    Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or object) centrally involves or expresses religious ideas, symbols, practices, or narratives.
  • B. hasNationalProgramming
    Indicates that an entity provides or is associated with programming content that is broadcast or distributed at a national level.
  • C. hasReligiousCharacter
    Indicates that an entity possesses a religious nature, function, or affiliation, or is characterized by religious aspects or significance.
  • D. hasReligiousSee
    Indicates that one entity serves as the ecclesiastical or religious jurisdiction/seat (see) of another entity.
  • E. hasReligiousSponsor
    Indicates that an entity is financially or organizationally supported by a religious individual, group, or institution.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b662e88190b9323daab8c28a21 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb40a504d48190ace96e814d99b182 completed March 31, 2026, 3:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb049f1614819087360d1a4c6f0faa completed March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb14be17208190bb51c3dfcb613f20 completed March 31, 2026, 12:26 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:28 p.m.