Triple

T8074209
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Florida law E188451 entity
Predicate subjectTo P258 FINISHED
Object Florida Evidence Code E5152 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Florida Evidence Code | Statement: [Florida law, subjectTo, Florida Evidence Code]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Florida Evidence Code
Context triple: [Florida law, subjectTo, Florida Evidence Code]
  • A. Georgia Evidence Code
    The Georgia Evidence Code is the body of state law that governs what evidence is admissible and how it must be presented in Georgia courts.
  • B. Oregon Evidence Code
    The Oregon Evidence Code is the body of rules that governs what evidence is admissible and how it may be used in legal proceedings in Oregon’s courts.
  • C. Florida statutes chosen
    Florida Statutes are the codified laws of the State of Florida, organized by subject and enacted by the state’s legislature to govern a wide range of civil, criminal, and administrative matters.
  • D. Florida law
    Florida law is the body of statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions that govern legal rights, obligations, and procedures within the state of Florida.
  • E. California Evidence Code
    The California Evidence Code is a comprehensive statutory framework that governs the admissibility and use of evidence in California courts.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b50c708190863f661d438e68df completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb404a98408190b6c8eecb95ad086d completed March 31, 2026, 3:32 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cc63f000308190a55379f8bf67f0cd completed April 1, 2026, 12:16 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:27 p.m.