Triple

T8073009
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop E188420 entity
Predicate defendant P2238 FINISHED
Object Masterpiece Cakeshop E32826 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Masterpiece Cakeshop | Statement: [Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, defendant, Masterpiece Cakeshop]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Masterpiece Cakeshop
Context triple: [Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, defendant, Masterpiece Cakeshop]
  • A. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. chosen
    Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. is a Colorado bakery best known for its central role in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case involving religious freedom and anti-discrimination laws.
  • B. Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop
    Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop is a Colorado lawsuit in which attorney Autumn Scardina sued baker Jack Phillips and his bakery for refusing to create a cake celebrating her gender transition, raising renewed questions about the balance between LGBTQ+ anti-discrimination protections and religious freedom.
  • C. Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
    Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, on narrow grounds, that Colorado officials had shown unconstitutional hostility toward a baker’s religious beliefs when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against his refusal to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.
  • D. Obergefell v. Hodges
    Obergefell v. Hodges is the landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide by ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry.
  • E. DeBoer v. Snyder
    DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b50c708190863f661d438e68df completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb40482200819086c639f64c01fbb5 completed March 31, 2026, 3:32 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cc63ecb04881909b1849dc4ef7c2bc completed April 1, 2026, 12:16 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:27 p.m.