Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California | Statement: [Law of the River, includesInstrument, Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California]

Target entity: Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California
Context triple: [Law of the River, includesInstrument, Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California]

• A. Arizona v. United States
  Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
• B. California v. Texas
  California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
• C. Arizona v. Johnson
  Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
• D. Arizona v. Evans
  Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
• E. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
  Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of using an independent commission, rather than the state legislature, to draw congressional district boundaries.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California
Triple: [Law of the River, includesInstrument, Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California]

The Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that apportioned Colorado River water among several southwestern states and tribes, forming a key legal foundation of the Law of the River.

Target entity: Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California
Target entity description: The Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that apportioned Colorado River water among several southwestern states and tribes, forming a key legal foundation of the Law of the River.

• A. Arizona v. United States
  Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
• B. California v. Texas
  California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
• C. Arizona v. Johnson
  Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
• D. Arizona v. Evans
  Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
• E. Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
  Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of using an independent commission, rather than the state legislature, to draw congressional district boundaries.
• F. None of above. chosen