Triple
T8067946
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colorado River Compact |
E188292
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | water allocation agreement |
C8918
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: water allocation agreement Context triple: [Colorado River Compact, instanceOf, water allocation agreement]
-
A.
water resources management agreement
chosen
A water resources management agreement is a formal arrangement between parties that defines rights, responsibilities, and coordinated actions for the sustainable allocation, use, protection, and monitoring of shared water resources.
-
B.
water resources development act
The Water Resources Development Act is a recurring United States federal law that authorizes and guides the planning, construction, and maintenance of water resources projects such as navigation, flood control, and ecosystem restoration, primarily carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
-
C.
water management project
A water management project is an organized initiative that plans, develops, and operates systems and practices to sustainably collect, store, distribute, and protect water resources for human and environmental needs.
-
D.
water management structure
A water management structure is a constructed facility or system designed to control, store, convey, or regulate the quantity and movement of water in natural or built environments.
-
E.
water management agency
A water management agency is an organization responsible for planning, regulating, and overseeing the sustainable allocation, use, and protection of water resources within a defined region.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b42674819086840efea12478e5 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:27 p.m.