Triple
T8067879
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alex Kozinski |
E188290
|
entity |
| Predicate | serviceOnCourtOfFederalClaimsEnd |
P44665
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1985-11-07 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1985-11-07 | Statement: [Alex Kozinski, serviceOnCourtOfFederalClaimsEnd, 1985-11-07]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: serviceOnCourtOfFederalClaimsEnd Context triple: [Alex Kozinski, serviceOnCourtOfFederalClaimsEnd, 1985-11-07]
-
A.
serviceEndEEOC
Indicates the point in time when an employee’s service or employment ends for purposes related to EEOC reporting or compliance.
-
B.
servedAtCourtOf
chosen
Indicates that an individual performed official duties or held a position in the court of a particular ruler or governing authority.
-
C.
endTime (Chief Judge SDNY)
Indicates the point in time at which the individual’s tenure or service as Chief Judge of the Southern District of New York concludes.
-
D.
losesCourtCaseTo
Indicates that one party is defeated in a legal proceeding by another party, with the decision rendered in favor of the latter.
-
E.
hasDefendantService
Indicates that a particular method, action, or process is used to formally serve legal notice or documents to a defendant in a legal proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b42674819086840efea12478e5 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3ff8a4fc8190a97fc7111ca7ec4d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb049cd51c8190bb3b0f503e42fa8d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:27 p.m.