Triple
T8067312
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saar status referendum of 1955 |
E188275
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposedStatus |
P13063
|
FINISHED |
| Object | European territory under Western European Union auspices |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: European territory under Western European Union auspices | Statement: [Saar status referendum of 1955, proposedStatus, European territory under Western European Union auspices]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedStatus Context triple: [Saar status referendum of 1955, proposedStatus, European territory under Western European Union auspices]
-
A.
prospectStatus
Indicates the current stage or condition of a potential customer or lead within a prospecting or sales process.
-
B.
approvalStatus
Indicates the current state of authorization or acceptance granted to an entity or action.
-
C.
status
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
-
D.
hasProposedOutcome
chosen
Indicates that an action, decision, or process is associated with a suggested or anticipated result that is being put forward but not yet realized or confirmed.
-
E.
draftStatus
Indicates the current stage or condition of an item within a drafting or revision process (e.g., whether it is in draft, under review, or finalized).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b42674819086840efea12478e5 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3ff75d208190b7c53d2fe55878ac |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb049cd51c8190bb3b0f503e42fa8d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:26 p.m.