Triple

T806519
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cassegrain focus E17448 entity
Predicate usesSecondaryMirror P8983 FINISHED
Object convex secondary mirror LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: convex secondary mirror | Statement: [Cassegrain focus, usesSecondaryMirror, convex secondary mirror]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesSecondaryMirror
Context triple: [Cassegrain focus, usesSecondaryMirror, convex secondary mirror]
  • A. hasSecondaryMirrorPosition
    Indicates the spatial placement or configuration of a secondary mirror relative to the primary optical system.
  • B. secondaryMirrorShape chosen
    Indicates that one entity specifies or defines the geometric shape of a secondary mirror associated with another entity.
  • C. primaryMirrorShape
    Indicates that one entity has a primary mirror whose geometric shape or curvature type is specified by the other entity.
  • D. mirrorType
    Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of mirror in relation to another entity.
  • E. primaryMirrorConfiguration
    Indicates the specific structural and optical setup used for a system’s primary mirror.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4937ae8a08190b5084a03d532b30e completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ac07fedc8190ab05595f25c1792f completed March 1, 2026, 9:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa7221c081908068e66fe720f26d completed March 1, 2026, 9:06 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.