Triple
T8052796
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Intel Core i3-10100Y |
E187714
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsAES-NI |
P80757
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Intel Core i3-10100Y, supportsAES-NI, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsAES-NI Context triple: [Intel Core i3-10100Y, supportsAES-NI, yes]
-
A.
supportsParallelEncryption
Indicates that the subject is capable of performing encryption operations in parallel, rather than strictly sequentially.
-
B.
encryptionModeSupport
Indicates that an entity supports or is compatible with a specified mode of encryption.
-
C.
supportsARMv8_5A
Indicates that the subject provides compatibility with, or implements the features of, the ARMv8.5-A architecture.
-
D.
supportsCipherSuite
Indicates that one entity is capable of using or handling a specified cryptographic cipher suite in secure communications.
-
E.
supportsNeuralNetworkAcceleration
Indicates that one entity provides hardware or software capabilities that enhance the speed or efficiency of neural network computations for another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b15e948190a62fd7af5218426a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3f7c425c8190aa1b2f534afeb58c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb049a1b9c8190811c396421ebf9c9 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb14bcbbc0819094a98e7ffffb7a40 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:25 p.m.