Triple
T8038948
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hustlin’ Owls |
E187385
|
entity |
| Predicate | rivalryRegion |
P80695
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cascade Collegiate Conference schools |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cascade Collegiate Conference schools | Statement: [Hustlin’ Owls, rivalryRegion, Cascade Collegiate Conference schools]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rivalryRegion Context triple: [Hustlin’ Owls, rivalryRegion, Cascade Collegiate Conference schools]
-
A.
rivalryBasis
Indicates the underlying reason, cause, or grounds on which a rivalry between entities is based.
-
B.
rivalryInvolvesCity
Indicates that a rivalry relationship includes or is associated with a particular city as one of its involved locations.
-
C.
rivalryName
Indicates that a specific name or label is assigned to a rivalry relationship between two entities.
-
D.
rivalOf
Indicates a relationship in which two entities compete against or oppose each other, often seeking advantage in the same domain or objective.
-
E.
rivalLeague
Indicates that two leagues are in competition with each other, typically vying for similar audiences, resources, or status.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b00cb48190b59a300f70e97bd7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3f1bb1d88190b3d2c83387c8ce43 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb049688208190b32088bd2c5930bc |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb14bcbbc0819094a98e7ffffb7a40 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:23 p.m.