Triple
T8027180
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2002 Florida gubernatorial election |
E186883
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Florida state election |
C12162
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Florida state election Context triple: [2002 Florida gubernatorial election, instanceOf, Florida state election]
-
A.
California state election
A California state election is a formal, statewide process in which eligible voters in California choose public officials, decide on ballot measures, and influence state governance according to established electoral laws and procedures.
-
B.
New York state election
A New York state election is a formal, scheduled process in which eligible voters in New York choose candidates for state offices and decide on statewide ballot measures according to state election laws and procedures.
-
C.
gubernatorial election
chosen
A gubernatorial election is a political contest in which voters choose the governor, the chief executive of a state or similar subnational jurisdiction.
-
D.
Missouri election
Missouri election refers to any formal voting process held within the state of Missouri to select public officials, decide ballot measures, or determine party nominees at the local, state, or federal level.
-
E.
county in Florida
A county in Florida is an administrative subdivision of the state that has defined geographic boundaries, a local government, and responsibilities for providing regional services such as law enforcement, courts, and infrastructure to its residents.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82ad4e2c8190a693e3c9e30fe66f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:21 p.m.