Triple
T8018521
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R line |
E186680
|
entity |
| Predicate | division |
P889
|
FINISHED |
| Object | B Division |
E107127
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: B Division | Statement: [R line, division, B Division]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: B Division Context triple: [R line, division, B Division]
-
A.
B Division
B Division is a competitive grouping or tier within an organized league or tournament structure, typically representing an intermediate or secondary level of play.
-
B.
B Division
chosen
B Division is the New York City Subway division that operates the system’s lettered routes, including services like the R train.
-
C.
Division Two
Division Two is one of the constituent appellate divisions within California’s Fourth Appellate District Court of Appeal.
-
D.
Division Three
Division Three is one of the constituent appellate divisions within California’s Fourth Appellate District Court of Appeal.
-
E.
Second Division
The Second Division was a lower-tier competition within the Victorian Football Association that featured clubs competing below the top-level division in Australian rules football.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82ac7fc081909b1398cf025423af |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3df626e8819098a9f8908dfdad3b |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:22 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cc56c213ec8190b3bd96c42d1357e4 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:20 p.m.