Triple

T8010168
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Thomas Kostura E186467 entity
Predicate partyToLegalCase P15954 FINISHED
Object Tanco v. Haslam E28842 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tanco v. Haslam | Statement: [Thomas Kostura, partyToLegalCase, Tanco v. Haslam]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tanco v. Haslam
Context triple: [Thomas Kostura, partyToLegalCase, Tanco v. Haslam]
  • A. Tanco v. Haslam chosen
    Tanco v. Haslam was a federal court case challenging Tennessee’s refusal to recognize same-sex marriages, which became one of the cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • B. Tennessee v. Lane
    Tennessee v. Lane is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to require states to provide accessible courthouses under the Americans with Disabilities Act as a valid enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • C. Alabama v. Shelton
    Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
  • D. DeBoer v. Snyder
    DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • E. Crawford v. Washington
    Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82abaffc8190ab8af79cdbc31ab3 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3d70caf8819090a9f98025470c0d completed March 31, 2026, 3:20 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cc63c1f76881909ad6d7777090f2e2 completed April 1, 2026, 12:16 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:19 p.m.