Triple

T8009160
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 4033 E186439 entity
Predicate obsoletes P101 FINISHED
Object RFC 3090 E707272 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 3090 | Statement: [RFC 4033, obsoletes, RFC 3090]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 3090
Context triple: [RFC 4033, obsoletes, RFC 3090]
  • A. RFC 3490
    RFC 3490 is an Internet standard that defines Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA), enabling the use of non-ASCII characters in domain names.
  • B. RFC 3980
    RFC 3980 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that previously specified aspects of the iSCSI (Internet Small Computer Systems Interface) protocol before being superseded by RFC 7143.
  • C. RFC 3710
    RFC 3710 is an IETF document that defines the purpose, structure, and procedures of the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) within the Internet standards process.
  • D. RFC 3008 chosen
    RFC 3008 is an earlier Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standards document related to DNS security that was later superseded by RFC 4033.
  • E. RFC 3610
    RFC 3610 is an IETF specification that defines the Counter with CBC-MAC (CCM) mode of operation for cryptographic block ciphers, commonly used for providing authenticated encryption in network protocols such as Wi-Fi security (CCMP).
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82abaffc8190ab8af79cdbc31ab3 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3d6f76408190a1312369521a187a completed March 31, 2026, 3:20 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cc63c1f76881909ad6d7777090f2e2 completed April 1, 2026, 12:16 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:19 p.m.