Triple
T8009005
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 857 |
E186435
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Telnet protocol |
E5624
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Telnet protocol | Statement: [RFC 857, relatedTo, Telnet protocol]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Telnet protocol Context triple: [RFC 857, relatedTo, Telnet protocol]
-
A.
Telnet
chosen
Telnet is a network protocol and command-line tool that allows users to remotely access and manage devices over a text-based terminal connection.
-
B.
Telnet Status Option
The Telnet Status Option is a protocol extension defined in RFC 858 that allows a Telnet server to report its current status and options in use to a client.
-
C.
Telnet Echo Option
The Telnet Echo Option is a protocol extension that defines how character echoing is negotiated and handled between Telnet clients and servers to control what input is displayed to the user.
-
D.
RFC 854
RFC 854 is the foundational Internet standard that specifies the Telnet protocol for remote, text-based communication over TCP/IP networks.
-
E.
TCP/IP
TCP/IP is the fundamental communication protocol suite that enables data transmission and networking across the internet and most modern computer networks.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82abaffc8190ab8af79cdbc31ab3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3d6f76408190a1312369521a187a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:20 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cc63c1f76881909ad6d7777090f2e2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:19 p.m.