Triple
T8001249
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mental Capacity Act 2005 |
E186252
|
entity |
| Predicate | providesSafeguard |
P74614
|
FINISHED |
| Object | independent mental capacity advocacy service |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: independent mental capacity advocacy service | Statement: [Mental Capacity Act 2005, providesSafeguard, independent mental capacity advocacy service]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providesSafeguard Context triple: [Mental Capacity Act 2005, providesSafeguard, independent mental capacity advocacy service]
-
A.
safeguard
Indicates taking protective actions to shield someone or something from harm, loss, or danger.
-
B.
providesProtectionAgainst
Indicates that one entity serves to guard, shield, or defend another entity from a specified harm, threat, or adverse effect.
-
C.
providesProtectionIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity offers protection or safeguarding to another entity within a specified context, location, or situation.
-
D.
safeguardingMeasuresInclude
Indicates that certain specific protective or security measures are contained within, or form part of, a broader set of safeguarding measures.
-
E.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82aaaf24819084b94d18f699ba53 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3c9cd06081908b62bb41e228c321 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb0483d3b48190b250c7603d747bca |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:17 p.m.