Triple
T7996863
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Das Relativitätsprinzip |
E186147
|
entity |
| Predicate | belongsToDiscipline |
P25609
|
FINISHED |
| Object | history of science |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: history of science | Statement: [Das Relativitätsprinzip, belongsToDiscipline, history of science]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: belongsToDiscipline Context triple: [Das Relativitätsprinzip, belongsToDiscipline, history of science]
-
A.
associatedWithDiscipline
Indicates that an entity has a relevant connection or involvement with a particular academic, professional, or thematic discipline.
-
B.
subDisciplineOf
Indicates that one discipline is a more specialized or narrower field within another, broader discipline.
-
C.
supportsDiscipline
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or endorsement that helps sustain or advance a particular discipline.
-
D.
hasSubdiscipline
Indicates that one discipline includes another, more specialized field of study as a subordinate branch.
-
E.
typeDiscipline
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, categorized under, or characterized by a particular discipline or field of study.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca829c6c308190ab05b43d234c52b2 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3c97968481908d261b3f0bd6b8e6 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb0483d3b48190b250c7603d747bca |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:17 p.m.