Triple
T7994541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hara mangrove forests |
E186089
|
entity |
| Predicate | dominantTreeCommonName |
P80238
|
FINISHED |
| Object | grey mangrove |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: grey mangrove | Statement: [Hara mangrove forests, dominantTreeCommonName, grey mangrove]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dominantTreeCommonName Context triple: [Hara mangrove forests, dominantTreeCommonName, grey mangrove]
-
A.
dominantTree
Indicates that one tree has a dominant or prevailing influence over another tree, such as in size, canopy coverage, or competitive advantage within a shared environment.
-
B.
dominantPlantFamily
Indicates that one plant family is the most prevalent or ecologically dominant group within a specified area, community, or context.
-
C.
dominantCommunity
Indicates that one community holds a prevailing or controlling influence, status, or presence over others within a given context.
-
D.
hasSurroundingTreeCommonName
Indicates that an entity is associated with a surrounding tree identified by its common (vernacular) name.
-
E.
dominantBranch
Indicates that one branch in a branching structure is the primary or prevailing branch relative to the others.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca829c6c308190ab05b43d234c52b2 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3c73ba388190bcedc29fbdd22f3c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb0483d3b48190b250c7603d747bca |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb14bbbacc81909c6cf8ec35314bbb |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:16 p.m.