Triple
T7987505
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 8174 |
E185718
|
entity |
| Predicate | title |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words |
E185718
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words | Statement: [RFC 8174, title, Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words Context triple: [RFC 8174, title, Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words]
-
A.
RFC 2119
RFC 2119 is an IETF document that defines the standard key words (like "MUST" and "SHOULD") used to indicate requirement levels in technical specifications.
-
B.
RFC 8174
chosen
RFC 8174 is an IETF document that clarifies the interpretation of requirement-level keywords like “MUST” and “SHOULD” in technical specifications, updating the guidance originally given in RFC 2119.
-
C.
RFC 2866
RFC 2866 is an IETF specification that defines the accounting extensions for the RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service) protocol used in network access and usage tracking.
-
D.
RFC 1670
RFC 1670 is an early Internet standards document related to network protocols that was later superseded by RFC 1901.
-
E.
RFC 9002
RFC 9002 is an IETF standard that specifies the loss detection and congestion control mechanisms for the QUIC transport protocol.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca829a2cfc819083d591d58ec04075 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3c4d11b08190aa13afb17155462c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cbe0ed61588190b01423061acfce49 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:15 p.m.