Triple
T7987342
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SNMPv2-Trap |
E185714
|
entity |
| Predicate | acknowledgement |
P80190
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no application-level acknowledgement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no application-level acknowledgement | Statement: [SNMPv2-Trap, acknowledgement, no application-level acknowledgement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: acknowledgement Context triple: [SNMPv2-Trap, acknowledgement, no application-level acknowledgement]
-
A.
thanks
Indicates that one entity expresses gratitude or appreciation to another for an action, service, or favor.
-
B.
acknowledgedIn
Indicates that one entity formally recognizes, credits, or expresses appreciation for another entity within a specified work, context, or communication.
-
C.
acknowledgmentDate
Indicates the date on which an acknowledgment of something (such as receipt, notice, or information) is formally recorded or recognized.
-
D.
affirms
Indicates that one entity explicitly confirms, supports, or asserts the truth or validity of another entity, statement, or proposition.
-
E.
agreement
Indicates that two or more parties mutually consent to and accept shared terms, conditions, or understandings.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca829a2cfc819083d591d58ec04075 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3c4d11b08190aa13afb17155462c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb048009a08190b4c577208a9f8f76 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb14bbbacc81909c6cf8ec35314bbb |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:15 p.m.