Triple
T7981021
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Windows services |
E185568
|
entity |
| Predicate | canRunAs |
P9928
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Local System account |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Local System account | Statement: [Windows services, canRunAs, Local System account]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canRunAs Context triple: [Windows services, canRunAs, Local System account]
-
A.
canRunOn
Indicates that one entity is capable of operating, executing, or functioning on another entity (such as a platform, system, or environment).
-
B.
canPerform
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or capacity to carry out a specific action or function on or with another entity.
-
C.
canAuthorize
Indicates that one entity has the power or permission to grant approval or official permission for another entity to perform an action or access a resource.
-
D.
canEnforce
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capability to compel compliance with rules, decisions, or obligations upon another entity.
-
E.
canUse
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or suitability to make use of another entity or resource.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca829851908190b4e03829353ee7c3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3c274ce48190854d389d43ce14b8 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb048009a08190b4c577208a9f8f76 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:15 p.m.