Triple
T7977047
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 6750 |
E185472
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 6749 |
E184245
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 6749 | Statement: [RFC 6750, relatedTo, RFC 6749]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 6749 Context triple: [RFC 6750, relatedTo, RFC 6749]
-
A.
RFC 6749
chosen
RFC 6749 is the IETF specification that defines the OAuth 2.0 authorization framework used for secure delegated access to web resources.
-
B.
RFC 6750
RFC 6750 is an IETF specification that defines the use of bearer tokens for securing HTTP requests in the OAuth 2.0 authorization framework.
-
C.
RFC 5849
RFC 5849 is the Internet standard that originally defined the OAuth 1.0 protocol for secure delegated authorization before being superseded by OAuth 2.0 in RFC 6749.
-
D.
RFC 2617
RFC 2617 is an Internet standard that defined HTTP authentication mechanisms, including Basic and Digest Access Authentication, before being superseded by RFC 7235.
-
E.
OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect is an identity layer built on top of OAuth 2.0 that enables secure user authentication and single sign-on across applications.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca829851908190b4e03829353ee7c3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3bf716508190b4245bd5d89ae8c4 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:13 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cbe0cc09a081909cb92cd4864ef50d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:14 p.m.