Triple
T7962374
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lunice |
E184900
|
entity |
| Predicate | name |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lunice |
E184900
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lunice | Statement: [Lunice, name, Lunice]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lunice Context triple: [Lunice, name, Lunice]
-
A.
Lunice
chosen
Lunice is a Canadian electronic music producer and DJ known for his innovative trap-influenced beats and as one half of the duo TNGHT.
-
B.
Lunan
Lunan is a small coastal settlement in Angus, Scotland, known for its proximity to the scenic Lunan Bay beach.
-
C.
Lusei
Lusei are a major clan of the Mizo people of Northeast India, historically influential in shaping Mizo culture, language, and social organization.
-
D.
Laynez
Laynez is a variant spelling of the Spanish surname Laínez, historically associated with figures such as Diego Laínez, a prominent 16th-century Jesuit.
-
E.
Laino
Laino is a small Italian municipality located in the Valle d’Intelvi area of the Lombardy region, near Lake Como.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8293a2388190aace944d7ed9c0c0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3b9df72081908d33925da10192e9 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cc566604e881908792c7155a370e4c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:12 p.m.