Triple

T7959547
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Orange River region E184825 entity
Predicate conflictsType P1397 FINISHED
Object land conflicts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: land conflicts | Statement: [Orange River region, conflictsType, land conflicts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conflictsType
Context triple: [Orange River region, conflictsType, land conflicts]
  • A. conflictType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of conflict that characterizes the relationship or interaction between entities.
  • B. conflictWith
    Indicates that two entities are in opposition or disagreement, such that their goals, actions, or states are incompatible or interfere with each other.
  • C. conflictedBetween
    Indicates being torn or uncertain between two or more options, positions, or commitments.
  • D. usedInConflictType
    Indicates that something (such as a resource, method, or capability) is employed or applied within a specific type or category of conflict.
  • E. typicalConflict
    Indicates that there is a commonly occurring or characteristic conflict or opposition between the related entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8293a2388190aace944d7ed9c0c0 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3b80050c81909b2db95ade495052 completed March 31, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb0473d7dc8190a25d0cf460b9fcbe completed March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:11 p.m.