Triple
T7957748
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hastings, Iowa |
E184781
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOfficialName |
P66
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hastings, Iowa |
E184781
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hastings, Iowa | Statement: [Hastings, Iowa, hasOfficialName, Hastings, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hastings, Iowa Context triple: [Hastings, Iowa, hasOfficialName, Hastings, Iowa]
-
A.
Hastings, Iowa
chosen
Hastings, Iowa is a small rural city located in southwestern Iowa within Mills County.
-
B.
Harris, Iowa
Harris, Iowa is a small rural city located in Osceola County in the northwestern part of the state.
-
C.
Hancock, Iowa
Hancock, Iowa is a small rural city located in western Iowa within Pottawattamie County.
-
D.
Hartford, Iowa
Hartford, Iowa is a small city in south-central Iowa that forms part of the Des Moines metropolitan area.
-
E.
Havelock, Iowa
Havelock, Iowa is a small rural city in Pocahontas County in northwestern Iowa.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8293a2388190aace944d7ed9c0c0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3b7ebb24819094bc011d51ef63fb |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:11 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cbe072ef4c8190a8e078c5280913db |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:11 p.m.