Triple
T795070
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CME livestock futures |
E16999
|
entity |
| Predicate | riskManagedBy |
P19221
|
FINISHED |
| Object | initial margin |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: initial margin | Statement: [CME livestock futures, riskManagedBy, initial margin]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: riskManagedBy Context triple: [CME livestock futures, riskManagedBy, initial margin]
-
A.
riskManagement
Indicates the implementation of strategies and actions to identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks associated with an entity or activity.
-
B.
riskType
Indicates the category or nature of risk associated with an entity, event, or relationship.
-
C.
riskFeature
Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a characteristic, condition, or attribute that increases the likelihood or severity of a negative outcome for another entity or situation.
-
D.
risk
Indicates that one entity is exposed or subject to potential harm, loss, or adverse outcome arising from another entity, action, or situation.
-
E.
riskLevel
Indicates the degree of potential harm, loss, or adverse outcome associated with a particular situation, action, or entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49378b9c48190adbf5f62e5b7aca1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a7b04cd8819092e2fd7ba4df8672 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a510f61881909175d6d8719246cd |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4a5edd0248190bd0240e5b3e67c71 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.