Triple

T7936056
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject EISA E184290 entity
Predicate performanceComparedToISA P66611 FINISHED
Object higher throughput than ISA LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher throughput than ISA | Statement: [EISA, performanceComparedToISA, higher throughput than ISA]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: performanceComparedToISA
Context triple: [EISA, performanceComparedToISA, higher throughput than ISA]
  • A. hasBaseISA
    Indicates that an entity’s base or fundamental type is a specified ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) or foundational classification.
  • B. comparesArchitectureTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity evaluates or contrasts the structure, design, or architectural characteristics of another entity against a reference or alternative architecture.
  • C. performanceModel
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a performance model that represents, predicts, or characterizes the performance behavior of another entity.
  • D. instructionSetSize
    Indicates the size or number of instructions defined in an instruction set.
  • E. performanceMeasurement
    Indicates the act of assessing, quantifying, or evaluating how well an entity, process, or system performs against defined criteria or objectives.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8290c21c8190906a5ca6fe2b03c4 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3aede3cc81908b0d3b54e68997b9 completed March 31, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae9335f288190ba96781fd6576a2b completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:08 p.m.