Triple
T7935726
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UCSD Pascal |
E184283
|
entity |
| Predicate | codeGeneration |
P69703
|
FINISHED |
| Object | machine-independent p-code |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: machine-independent p-code | Statement: [UCSD Pascal, codeGeneration, machine-independent p-code]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: codeGeneration Context triple: [UCSD Pascal, codeGeneration, machine-independent p-code]
-
A.
codeFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the implementation, encoding, or programmatic representation for another entity.
-
B.
code
Indicates that an entity writes, develops, or produces computer software or source code.
-
C.
secondGenerationCode
Indicates that the subject is a second-generation version or iteration of a codebase, derived from and improving upon an earlier generation.
-
D.
engineCode
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with a specific engine identification code or designation.
-
E.
generationMethod
chosen
Indicates the process, technique, or procedure by which something is created, produced, or derived.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8290c21c8190906a5ca6fe2b03c4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3aec394081909a9569c02ac372af |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae9335f288190ba96781fd6576a2b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:08 p.m.