Triple
T7934612
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ElGamal |
E184257
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | asymmetric cryptographic scheme |
C2105
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: asymmetric cryptographic scheme Context triple: [ElGamal, instanceOf, asymmetric cryptographic scheme]
-
A.
asymmetric cryptographic algorithm
chosen
An asymmetric cryptographic algorithm is a method that uses a mathematically related pair of keys—one public and one private—to enable secure operations such as encryption, decryption, and digital signatures without sharing secret keys.
-
B.
encryption scheme
An encryption scheme is a systematic method that transforms readable data into an unreadable form using algorithms and keys to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and secure communication.
-
C.
cryptographic primitive
A cryptographic primitive is a low-level, well-defined algorithm or protocol (such as a hash function, block cipher, or digital signature scheme) that serves as a basic building block for constructing more complex cryptographic systems and protocols.
-
D.
cryptographic data structure
A cryptographic data structure is a data organization that uses cryptographic primitives to ensure properties like integrity, authenticity, privacy, or verifiability of the stored or processed information.
-
E.
cryptographic protocol
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8290c21c8190906a5ca6fe2b03c4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:08 p.m.