Triple
T7929011
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 1123 |
E184138
|
entity |
| Predicate | updates |
P4061
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 950 |
E60448
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 950 | Statement: [RFC 1123, updates, RFC 950]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 950 Context triple: [RFC 1123, updates, RFC 950]
-
A.
RFC 950
chosen
RFC 950 is an Internet standard that defines the procedures and format for subnetting IP networks, extending the original IPv4 addressing scheme.
-
B.
RFC 974
RFC 974 is an early Internet standard that defined the original mechanisms for mail routing and the use of MX records in the Domain Name System (DNS).
-
C.
RFC 951
RFC 951 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) used for automatic IP address assignment and basic network configuration of diskless or minimally configured hosts.
-
D.
RFC 0960
RFC 0960 is an early Internet standards document that specified aspects of TCP/IP networking behavior later superseded by RFC 1122.
-
E.
RFC 973
RFC 973 is an early Internet standards document that refines and extends the domain name system concepts introduced in RFC 882.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828fe7bc819090f52c88dcd72183 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3ac9ac4c819082cd2190fc3ce5a2 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cb5c01602081908ea1af24785260ff |
completed | March 31, 2026, 5:30 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:07 p.m.