Triple

T7928672
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 8999 E184130 entity
Predicate updates P4061 FINISHED
Object RFC 3168 E64274 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 3168 | Statement: [RFC 8999, updates, RFC 3168]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 3168
Context triple: [RFC 8999, updates, RFC 3168]
  • A. RFC 3168 chosen
    RFC 3168 is an IETF standard that specifies the addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP and TCP to enable end-to-end congestion signaling without relying solely on packet loss.
  • B. RFC 1668
    RFC 1668 is an early Internet standards document that was later superseded by RFC 1901 as the protocol specifications evolved.
  • C. RFC 3416
    RFC 3416 is an Internet standard that specifies the protocol operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), defining how management data is exchanged between network devices and management systems.
  • D. RFC 3610
    RFC 3610 is an IETF specification that defines the Counter with CBC-MAC (CCM) mode of operation for cryptographic block ciphers, commonly used for providing authenticated encryption in network protocols such as Wi-Fi security (CCMP).
  • E. RFC 1908
    RFC 1908 is an older Internet standards document related to network management that was later superseded by RFC 3410.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca828fe7bc819090f52c88dcd72183 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3ac9ac4c819082cd2190fc3ce5a2 completed March 31, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cb5bfd08e88190bc6b2d77a148ae57 completed March 31, 2026, 5:30 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:07 p.m.