Triple

T7928420
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC Editorial Board E184125 entity
Predicate overseesAspect P31808 FINISHED
Object quality of RFC series LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: quality of RFC series | Statement: [RFC Editorial Board, overseesAspect, quality of RFC series]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: overseesAspect
Context triple: [RFC Editorial Board, overseesAspect, quality of RFC series]
  • A. coversAspect
    Indicates that one entity addresses, includes, or deals with a particular aspect or facet of another entity or topic.
  • B. governsAspectOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity exercises control, regulation, or determining influence over a particular aspect or component of another entity.
  • C. oversee
    Indicates having responsibility for supervising, directing, or managing the actions or work of another entity.
  • D. refersToAspect
    Indicates that one entity specifically references or points to a particular aspect, feature, or component of another entity.
  • E. supportsAspect
    Indicates that one entity provides backing, justification, or reinforcement for a particular aspect, feature, or component of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca828fe7bc819090f52c88dcd72183 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3ac9ac4c819082cd2190fc3ce5a2 completed March 31, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae9335f288190ba96781fd6576a2b completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:07 p.m.