Triple
T7928260
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 868 |
E184121
|
entity |
| Predicate | responseModel |
P48656
|
FINISHED |
| Object | single 32-bit time value |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single 32-bit time value | Statement: [RFC 868, responseModel, single 32-bit time value]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: responseModel Context triple: [RFC 868, responseModel, single 32-bit time value]
-
A.
responseField
chosen
Indicates that a particular piece of information is included as part of a response or output structure.
-
B.
responseFrom
Indicates that one entity is the originator or source of a response directed to another entity or request.
-
C.
typicalResponse
Indicates that an entity’s behavior, reaction, or outcome is the standard or commonly expected response in a given context or situation.
-
D.
responseTool
Indicates a tool, method, or mechanism used to produce, deliver, or manage a response in a given context.
-
E.
responseFormula
Indicates that one entity’s reaction, reply, or outcome is expressed or encoded in a specific formula or structured representation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828fe7bc819090f52c88dcd72183 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3ac9ac4c819082cd2190fc3ce5a2 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae9335f288190ba96781fd6576a2b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:07 p.m.