Triple
T7928167
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 8314 |
E184119
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletes |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 3207 |
E52728
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 3207 | Statement: [RFC 8314, obsoletes, RFC 3207]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 3207 Context triple: [RFC 8314, obsoletes, RFC 3207]
-
A.
RFC 3207
chosen
RFC 3207 is the Internet standard that specifies the STARTTLS extension for upgrading plain text email connections to use TLS encryption in SMTP.
-
B.
RFC 3710
RFC 3710 is an IETF document that defines the purpose, structure, and procedures of the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) within the Internet standards process.
-
C.
RFC 3652
RFC 3652 is an IETF standards-track document that specifies the technical architecture and protocols of the Handle System for assigning, managing, and resolving persistent digital identifiers.
-
D.
RFC 2572
RFC 2572 is an earlier IETF specification that defined the Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) before being superseded by RFC 3412.
-
E.
RFC 2487
RFC 2487 is an Internet standards document that originally defined the STARTTLS extension for securing SMTP connections with TLS, later superseded by RFC 3207.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828fe7bc819090f52c88dcd72183 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3ac9ac4c819082cd2190fc3ce5a2 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cb5bfd08e88190bc6b2d77a148ae57 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 5:30 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:07 p.m.