Triple
T79255
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | College Football Playoff |
E1589
|
entity |
| Predicate | considers |
P1120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conference champions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conference champions | Statement: [College Football Playoff, considers, conference champions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: considers Context triple: [College Football Playoff, considers, conference champions]
-
A.
considered
chosen
Indicates that one entity regards, judges, or thinks about another entity in a particular way or context.
-
B.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
C.
decides
Indicates that an entity makes a choice or determination between options, often resolving uncertainty or selecting a course of action.
-
D.
assumes
Indicates that one entity takes on, accepts, or presumes a role, responsibility, state, or fact regarding another entity or situation.
-
E.
approves
Indicates that one entity formally accepts, authorizes, or agrees to a proposal, action, or decision made by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24c60d19c8190a1b6c105ca59ef5b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24fd16c248190a6ee4cd96c388772 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24eb126b48190b410b859c1be99aa |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.